BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Hussain v. Leicestershire Constabulary [2002] UKEAT 836_01_1807 (18 July 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/836_01_1807.html
Cite as: [2002] UKEAT 836_1_1807, [2002] UKEAT 836_01_1807

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2002] UKEAT 836_01_1807
Appeal No. EAT/836/01

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 18 July 2002

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE J R REID QC

MR J C SHRIGLEY

MR P M SMITH



MR S HUSSAIN APPELLANT

LEICESTERSHIRE CONSTABULARY RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

Revised

© Copyright 2002


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant THE APPELLANT IN PERSON
    For the Respondent MS R CRASNOW
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed by:
    Messrs Browne & Jacobson
    Solicitors
    44 Castle Gate
    Nottingham NE1 7BJ


     

    JUDGE J R REID QC

  1. It seems to me, speaking for myself, that we have got some difficulties because whatever the rights and wrongs of this are, Mr Hussain has not seen the Skeleton Argument which has been prepared on his behalf; he has not seen the preliminary judgment; he has not seen the grounds of appeal, and it is a little difficult, however sympathetic we are to our customers, to think that we could fairly dispose of the appeal today in a way which would make Mr Hussain feel that he has had a fair crack at the whip.
  2. We think this has got to be adjourned. I think, probably, the best course is if the parties try to get a new hearing date downstairs, while they are still here. I do not know, for example, what Mr Hussain's duty rosters are, nor do I know what steps he has managed to take to get some new representation. One does not know, but sometimes, fairly closely knit communities like the police have friends and relations who are fairly obvious points of contact.
  3. I think the best thing we had better do is to try and see if Mr Hussain and Ms Crasnow and her instructing solicitor can go down to Listing and get a new date now which will give whoever Mr Hussain instructs a target date to aim at. It may concentrate their minds, and then the parties will have to come back and deal with the case later.
  4. In the meantime, it is not clear what should be done so far as Mr Hussain's existing solicitors are concerned. It may be something that is best taken up by his new solicitors. They should note that we do not have a power in this Tribunal to make wasted costs Orders, but (if it is appropriate) other steps are no doubt available.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2002/836_01_1807.html