BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) >> Andrew Upson v John Vincent Bailey (Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions : Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions) [2019] UKFTT 47 (PC) (10 December 2018) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKFTT/PC/2018/47.html Cite as: [2019] UKFTT 47 (PC) |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
| Case reference | REF/2016/1161 |
|---|---|
| Date of decision | 10/12/2018 |
| Adjudicator | Former Principal Judge Elizabeth Cooke |
| Applicant | Andrew Upson |
| Respondent | John Vincent Bailey |
| Main Category & Sub Category | |
| Category | Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions |
| Sub Category | Constructive trust - inferred common intention |
| Secondary Category & Sub Category | |
| Category | Beneficial interests, trusts and restrictions |
| Sub Category | Constructive trust - inferred common intention |
| Decision notes | [2019] UKFTT 47 (PC). Property purchased in Respondent's name renovated, over a period exceeding 10 years, by Applicant. He claimed to have a beneficial interest in it on the basis of a common intention constructive trust and applied for the entry of a restriction. Applicant's evidence was focused on the work he had done, but there was no evidence of any agreement or understanding and the registrar was directed to cancel the application for a restriction. Moreover, the agreement that Applicant claimed was made would have given him a claim in debt but not joint ownership. |
| Download decision(s) | [2019] UKFTT 47 (PC) |
