First-tier Tribunal (Tax)

[2014] UKFTT 554 (TC)

TC03680

 

 

 

Appeal number: TC/2014/00796

 

VAT – late filing of returns – no proof of posting – one return dated after due date – no reasonable excuse

 

 

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL

TAX CHAMBER

 

 

	SECOND 2 NONE VEHICLE REPAIRS	Appellant
	- and -
	THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY’S	Respondents
	REVENUE & CUSTOMS

 

 

 

TRIBUNAL:	JUDGE  ALASTAIR J RANKIN

 

 

 

The Tribunal determined the appeal on 19 May 2014 without a hearing under the provisions of Rule 26 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (default paper cases) having first read the Notice of Appeal dated 6 February 2014 and   HMRC’s Statement of Case (with enclosures).

 

 

 

 

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2014

DECISION

 

 

1.             The Appellant is appealing VAT default surcharges for the periods 03/09 and 12/09 of £429.09 and £508.73 respectively on the grounds that the returns were sent first class post at least 3 working days prior to the due dates.

2.             For the period 03/09 the due date for filing was Thursday 30 April 2009. Both the manual return and cheque payment were received on Monday 11 May 2009, eleven days late.

3.             For the period 12/09 the due date for filing was Sunday 31 January 2010. Both the manual return and cheque payment were received on Monday 8 February 2010, eight days late.

4.             The Appellant company had been in the default surcharge scheme since its first default for the period 09/07. On the reverse of the default surcharge notices is a standard paragraph stating that VAT returns and any tax due must reach HMRC by the due date. ‘If you expect to have any difficulties contact either your local VAT office…or the National Advice Service…’.

5.             The return for the period 03/09 is signed by a director of the Appellant company and dated 7 May 2009. Even if the return had been hand delivered on that date it would still have been seven days late.

6.             The return for the period 12/09 is signed by the same director and dated 29 January 2010. Even if this return had been posted first class on that date it could not have been received by HMRC before Monday 1 February by which time it would have been one day late. However the cheque in respect of the period 12/09 is dated 2 February 2010. As the return and cheque were both received on 8 February 2010 it is probable they were both posted in the same envelope.

7.             The Appellant company claims not to have received notification of the surcharges due to it moving premises in 2007. However the VAT returns, addressed to the former address, were all completed by the director and returned to HMRC without the address being amended.

8.             As no reasonable excuse has been offered by the Appellant company and as the two surcharge notices were correctly issued in accordance with section 59(4) of Value Added Tax Act 1994 the appeal is dismissed.

9.             The surcharges remain due for payment by the Appellant company.

10.         This document contains full findings of fact and reasons for the decision. Any party dissatisfied with this decision has a right to apply for permission to appeal against it pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009.   The application must be received by this Tribunal not later than 56 days after this decision is sent to that party.  The parties are referred to “Guidance to accompany a Decision from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)” which accompanies and forms part of this decision notice.

 

 

 

 

ALASTAIR J RANKIN

TRIBUNAL JUDGE

 

RELEASE DATE: 2 June 2014