First-tier Tribunal (Tax)

[2014] UKFTT 556 (TC)

TC03682

 

 

 

Appeal number: TC/2014/00820

 

Income Tax – late filing penalty – refusal by taxpayer to submit return using provisional figures – HMRC conducting an enquiry into previous years

 

 

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL

TAX CHAMBER

 

 

 

	PAUL COOMBS	Appellant
	- and -
	THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY’S	Respondents
	REVENUE & CUSTOMS

 

 

 

TRIBUNAL:	JUDGE  ALASTAIR J RANKIN

 

 

 

The Tribunal determined the appeal on 19 May 2014 without a hearing under the provisions of Rule 26 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal)(Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (default paper cases) having first read the Notice of Appeal dated 6 February 2014 and  HMRC’s Statement of Case submitted on 25 March 2014 (with enclosures).

 

 

 

 

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2014

DECISION

 

 

1.             The Appellant is appealing against late filing penalties of £100.00 and £300.00 for the tax year 2011/12. As at 25 March 2014 the Appellant had still not submitted his tax return for the year 2011/12.

2.             The Appellant claims that he has an ongoing tax enquiry by HMRC which began in January 2011. His tax returns for the year in dispute were in the possession of his tax specialists. HMRC collected all his paperwork from his tax specialists on 16 July 2013 and since then HMRC has not indicated whether the records have been examined. Therefore the submission of an accurate return for any more recent years will not have been accurate as the records are not in his possession.

3.             The Appellant states that he is more than willing and able to pay outstanding tax. However any payment made before HMRC has informed him of its decision regarding the outstanding returns may cause further complications and distress.

4.             HMRC contends that the Appellant has effectively stated that he is not prepared to file his 2011/12 tax return until he is certain about the correct tax liability for that year. His refusal to comply either with the filing requirements in section 8 Taxes Management Act 1970 or the advice given to him by HMRC concerning the use of provisional figures means that his claim to have a reasonable excuse for late filing is unsupported by the facts.

5.             HMRC issued a full tax return to the Appellant on 6 April 2012. Both the tax return and the Tax Guide issued with the return provide clear direction about the Appellant’s personal responsibilities as a taxpayer within the self-assessment system and his legal obligations to submit a tax return by the prescribed date. Both the tax return and Tax Guide caution that a series of late penalties will be charged should the relevant deadline be missed.

6.             The Appellant has not suggested he was ever in doubt about the filing date for his 2011/12 return but states that he needs HMRC to supply information about his tax liability before he submits his return. This is contrary to the way the self-assessment system operates.

7.             As the Appellant appears to have had access to his own records until they were collected by HMRC on 16 July 2013 there does not appear to be any reason why he could not have completed his 2011/12 tax return and submitted it before the filing deadline of 31 January 2013.

8.             Accordingly the appeal is dismissed and the penalties remain due for payment.

9.             This document contains full findings of fact and reasons for the decision. Any party dissatisfied with this decision has a right to apply for permission to appeal against it pursuant to Rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009.   The application must be received by this Tribunal not later than 56 days after this decision is sent to that party.  The parties are referred to “Guidance to accompany a Decision from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)” which accompanies and forms part of this decision notice.

 

 

 

 

ALASTAIR J RANKIN

TRIBUNAL JUDGE

 

RELEASE DATE: 2 June 2014