BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (Education (Other)) [2007] UKICO FS50082569 (27 September 2007) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2007/FS50082569.html Cite as: [2007] UKICO FS50082569 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
27 September 2007, Education (Other)
The complainant requested an executable version of the economic model used by NICE in its assessment of Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine and Memantine, drugs that are used to treat Alzheimer’s Disease. NICE refused to provide the information citing the exemptions in sections 36 and 41 of the Act. The Commissioner has decided that NICE appropriately relied upon section 41 when refusing to supply the information. He has also found that NICE breached section 10 of the Act in initially failing to respond to the request within twenty working days. The Commissioner has not ordered any remedial steps. This decision notice is currently under appeal to the information tribunal.
FOI 10: Upheld