BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust (Decision Notice) [2009] UKICO FS50202562 (17 November 2009) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2009/FS50202562.html Cite as: [2009] UKICO FS50202562 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Summary: The complainant made a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the -Act-) to the Liverpool Women-s NHS Foundation Trust (the -Trust-) for the text of any compromise agreements it had entered into with doctors and a list of exploratory or illustratory issues which were covered by the compromise agreements. Furthermore the complainant asked the Trust to provide him with its policy on free speech and the use of gag clauses. The Trust explained that it did not hold this information but provided advice and assistance as to similar information that it did hold. In relation to the remainder of the request it confirmed that the information was held but the Trust refused to disclose this information as it stated that it was exempt from disclosure by virtue of sections 41 and section 40(2) of the Act. During the course of the Commissioner-s investigation the Trust withdrew its application of the exemption contained at section 41 of the Act. The text of the compromise agreements was disclosed to the complainant in a redacted format. Furthermore the list of exploratory or illustratory issues covered by the compromise agreements was also disclosed to the complainant during the Commissioner-s investigation. The Commissioner has reviewed the remaining withheld information and considers that the Trust correctly applied section 40(2) in order to redact this information from the text of the compromise agreements. However the Commissioner considers that the Trust breached sections 1(1)(b), 10(1) and 17(1)(b) and (c) in its handling of the request. Information Tribunal appeal number EA/2009/0113 has been dismissed.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 10 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 40 - Complaint Not upheld
