BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Kingston University (Decision Notice) [2011] UKICO FS50315973 (26 May 2011) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2011/FS50315973.html Cite as: [2011] UKICO FS50315973 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Summary: The complainant requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the -˜Act-™) all of the workplace email addresses of the University-™s staff. The University confirmed that it held the information, but believed that it was exempt. It argued that the information was exempt by virtue of section 40(2) [third party personal data]. The complainant requested an internal review and it maintained its position. The complainant then referred this case to the Commissioner. During the course of his investigation, the University provided evidence that it was now relying on section 36(2)(c) [information would prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs]. The Commissioner finds that section 36(2)(c) was engaged and in all the circumstances of the case the public interest favoured the maintenance of the exemption over the disclosure of the information. He has therefore not been required to make a formal decision about the operation of section 40(2). He has found procedural breaches of sections 17(1)(b) and section 17(3), but requires no remedial steps to be taken.
Section of Act/EIR & Finding: FOI 17 - Complaint Upheld, FOI 36 - Complaint Not upheld
