BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Islington Council (Local government (District council)) [2015] UKICO FS50555868 (2 February 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2015/FS50555868.html Cite as: [2015] UKICO FS50555868 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
2 February 2015, Local government (District council)
The complainant has requested from London Borough of Islington (the “Council”) information in relation to the sale of specific commercial premises. There are two parts of this request. The Council applied section 14(2) of the FOIA to the first request for information. To the second request, the Council disclosed some of the requested information and applied section 40(2) of the FOIA to the remaining part of the request. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council has correctly relied upon section 40(2) of the FOIA to the second request. However, the Commissioner has dismissed the Council’s use of section 14(2) of the FOIA to the first request and he orders the Council to issue a fresh response to part 1 of the request. The Commissioner requires the Council to take issue a fresh response to part 1 of his request as detailed in paragraph 12 under FOIA without relying on section 14(2). Information Tribunal appeal EA/2014/0045 withdrawn.
FOI 14: Upheld FOI 40: Not upheld
