BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Department for Transport (Central government ) [2016] UKICO FS50592334 (8 March 2016) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2016/FS50592334.html Cite as: [2016] UKICO FS50592334 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
8 March 2016, Central government
The complainant has requested information about HS2 project. The Department for Transport (DfT) refused to provide the requested information under section 35(1)(a), section 40(2) and section 43(1) of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and as far as the withheld information is environmental, regulation 12(4)(d), 12(4)(e) and 12(5)(e) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR). The Commissioner’s decision is that the DfT was correct to deal with parts of the request under FOIA and parts under EIR. The Commissioner has numbered the documents in the order they appear on the ‘Explanatory Spreadsheet’ under each separate request which was provided by the DfT. Part 1 of the request: the DfT correctly applied regulation 12(5)(e) EIR. Part 2 of the request: the DfT correctly applied section 40(2) FOIA to the redactions made to document 1 and in part to document 9. It incorrectly applied this exemption to parts of document 9 and document 10 and 16 in full. It correctly applied regulation 12(4)(d) EIR to documents 8, 11-15 and 17-19. It incorrectly applied regulation 12(5)(e) EIR to documents 20 and 22-26. Part 3 of the request: the DfT incorrectly applied regulation 12(4)(e) EIR to the five documents to which this exception has been applied. However the Commissioner pro-actively applied regulation 13 EIR to two paragraphs identified in the email dated 8 March 2013. Part 4 of the request: The DfT correctly applied regulation 12(4)(d) EIR to the eight documents to which this exception has been applied. The Commissioner requires the public authority now disclose the following information: Part 2 of the request: documents 9 (in part), 10, 16, 20 and 22-26. Part 3 of the request: All five documents withheld apart from the two paragraphs identified in the email dated 8 March 2013 as the Commissioner pro-actively applied regulation 13 EIR to this information.
FOI 40: Partly upheld EIR 12(4)(d): Not upheld EIR 12(4)(e): Upheld EIR 12(5)(e): Partly upheld
