BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Information Commissioner's Office |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Liverpool City Council (Local government (City council)) [2016] UKICO FS50627643 (18 October 2016) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2016/FS50627643.html Cite as: [2016] UKICO FS50627643 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
18 October 2016, Local government (City council)
The complainant has requested information regarding Liverpool City Council’s Operator Licensing Conditions Consultation relating to Private Hire and/or Uber’s operations. The Commissioner’s decision is that Liverpool City Council has correctly applied the exemption at section 12 of the FOIA where the cost of compliance exceeds the appropriate limit. However, the Commissioner has also decided that Liverpool City Council did not provide adequate advice and assistance under section 16 of the FOIA. The Commissioner requires the public authority to provide the complainant with appropriate advice and assistance with regard to the requested information that can be provided, to enable an appropriately refined request to be made if necessary to ensure compliance with the legislation.
FOI 12: Not upheld FOI 16: Upheld
