Metropolitan Police Service (Police and criminal justice) [2020] UKICO fs50909321 (23 June 2020)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Metropolitan Police Service (Police and criminal justice) [2020] UKICO fs50909321 (23 June 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2020/fs50909321.html
Cite as: [2020] UKICO fs50909321

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Metropolitan Police Service

The complainant has requested information from some withheld chapters of a partly published report from the Metropolitan Police Service (the ‘MPS’). The MPS would neither confirm nor deny (‘NCND’) whether the requested information is held, citing the exemptions at sections 31(3) (law enforcement,) 40(5) (personal information) and 44(2) (statutory prohibition) of the FOIA. During the Commissioner’s investigation, it added reliance on section 30(3) (investigations and proceedings) of the FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that sections 31(3), 40(5) and 44(2) are not engaged. Section 30(3) is engaged but the public interest favours providing a confirmation or denial as to whether the information is held. The Commissioner requires the MPS issue a fresh response, which must confirm or deny whether the information is held, and either disclose the requested information or issue a valid refusal notice compliant with section 17 of the FOIA.

FOI 31: Complaint upheld FOI 40: Complaint upheld FOI 30: Complaint upheld

Decision notice: fs50909321


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2020/fs50909321.html