Public Health England (Health) [2021] UKICO IC-73557 (24 August 2021)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Public Health England (Health) [2021] UKICO IC-73557 (24 August 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2021/ic-73557.html
Cite as: [2021] UKICO IC-73557

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Public Health England

The complainant has requested information about the decision to de-classify COVID-19 as a High Consequence Infectious Disease. Public Health England (“PHE”), provided some information but withheld the remainder, relying on section 36 of the FOIA (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs) to do so. The Commissioner’s decision is that PHE is not entitled to rely on section 36 in respect of two out of the three documents it has withheld. Where PHE is entitled to rely on section 36, the public interest favours maintaining the exemption. PHE also breached both section 10 and section 17 of the FOIA in responding to the request. The Commissioner requires PHE to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: disclose, to the complainant, the documents it has identified to the Commissioner as Annex B and C respectively.

FOI 17: Complaint upheld FOI 10: Complaint upheld FOI 36: Complaint partly upheld

Decision notice: IC-73557

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2021/ic-73557.html