Liverpool City Council (Local government) [2022] UKICO 123566 (18 October 2022)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Liverpool City Council (Local government) [2022] UKICO 123566 (18 October 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/123566.html
Cite as: [2022] UKICO 123566

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Liverpool City Council

The complainant requested information from Liverpool City Council (‘the council’) regarding a development which ultimately did not go ahead. The council initially disclosed information to the complainant with sections redacted; however, it subsequently disclosed the unredacted information to the complainant in full. The complainant, however, argues that further information may be held by the council. The Commissioner’s decision is that, on the balance of probabilities, the council has disclosed all of the relevant information to the complainant. The Commissioner has decided, however, that the council did not comply with the requirements of Regulation 5(2). The Commissioner does not require the council to take any steps.

EIR 12(4)(a): Complaint not upheld EIR 5(2): Complaint upheld

Decision notice: 123566

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/123566.html