Liverpool City Council (Local government) [2022] UKICO 166849 (7 June 2022)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> Liverpool City Council (Local government) [2022] UKICO 166849 (7 June 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/166849.html
Cite as: [2022] UKICO 166849

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Liverpool City Council

The complainant requested information from Liverpool City Council (“LCC”) relating to Kingsley Road Experimental Traffic Regulation Order. By the date of this notice LCC had failed to provide a substantive response to this request. The Commissioner’s decision is that LCC has breached section 10(1) of the FOIA in that it failed to provide a valid response to the request within the statuary timeframe of 20 working days. The Commissioner requires LCC to respond to the complainant’s response in accordance with the FOIA. LCC must take these steps within 35 calendar days of the date of this decision notice.

FOI 10: Complaint upheld

Decision notice: 166849

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/166849.html