Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (Local government) [2022] UKICO 171539 (21 November 2022)
BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable PDF version]
[Help]
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
The complainant requested information from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (“the Council”) about communications between two named individuals at the Council, over a specified three month period, relating to complaints about a particular matter referenced within the request. The Commissioner’s decision is that the Council failed to provide an adequate response to the request. Consequently the Commissioner finds that the Council breached section 1(1) and section 10(1) of FOIA. The Commissioner requires the Council to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation. The Council must issue a fresh response to the request which is adequate for the purposes of FOIA. The Council must take these steps within 35 calendar days of the date of this decision notice. Failure to comply may result in the Commissioner making written certification of this fact to the High Court pursuant to section 54 of FOIA and may be dealt with as a contempt of court.
FOI 1(1):
Complaint upheld
FOI 10(1):
Complaint upheld
Decision notice: 171539
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/171539.html
