English Heritage (Other) [2022] UKICO 176659 (7 December 2022)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> English Heritage (Other) [2022] UKICO 176659 (7 December 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/176659.html
Cite as: [2022] UKICO 176659

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

English Heritage

The complainant has requested information relating to Oliver Reed’s blue plaque nomination. English Heritage (‘EH’) refused to provide the requested information, citing section 36(2)(b)(i) (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs). The Commissioner’s decision is that section 36(2)(b)(i) is engaged and the public interest lies in maintaining the exemption. In failing to respond to the request within twenty working days, EH breached section 10 of FOIA. The Commissioner does not require the public authority to take any steps.

FOI 36(2)(b)(i): Complaint not upheld FOI 10: Complaint upheld

Decision notice: 176659

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2022/176659.html