North Sea Transition Authority (Other) [2023] UKICO 223315 (15 May 2023)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Information Commissioner's Office


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Information Commissioner's Office >> North Sea Transition Authority (Other) [2023] UKICO 223315 (15 May 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2023/223315.html
Cite as: [2023] UKICO 223315

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


North Sea Transition Authority

The complainant requested from the North Sea Transition Authority (‘NSTA’) information relating to the potential environmental impact of Shell's Brent decommissioning project in the North Sea. The NSTA stated that it did not hold the requested information. The Commissioner’s decision is that the NSTA does hold the requested information in accordance with regulation 3(2)(a) of the EIR. In addition, in failing to respond to the internal review within the statutory timescale, the Commissioner has determined that NSTA breached regulation 11(4) of the EIR. The Commissioner requires the public authority to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: Issue a fresh response to the complainant, and either disclose the information or, in respect of any information it wishes to withhold, issue a refusal notice within the meaning of regulation 14 of the EIR specifying the exception relied on to withhold the information. The response should not rely on a claim that NSTA does not hold the information within the meaning of regulation 3(2) of the EIR. The public authority must take these steps within 35 calendar days of the date of this decision notice. Failure to comply may result in the Commissioner making written certification of this fact to the High Court pursuant to section 54 of FOIA and may be dealt with as a contempt of court.

EIR 11(4): Complaint upheld EIR 3(2): Complaint upheld

Decision notice: 223315


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKICO/2023/223315.html