BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> LITTLE WORLD (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1998] UKIntelP o06398 (13 March 1998)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1998/o06398.html
Cite as: [1998] UKIntelP o6398, [1998] UKIntelP o06398

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


LITTLE WORLD (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1998] UKIntelP o06398 (13 March 1998)

For the whole decision click here: o06398

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/063/98
Decision date
13 March 1998
Hearing officer
Mr M Reynolds
Mark
LITTLE WORLD
Classes
28
Applicant
Tomy UK Limited
Opponent
Andonis Violaris
Opposition
Sections 3(1)(b) & 5(4)(a)

Result

Section 3(1)(b) - Opposition failed.

Section 5(4)(a) - Opposition failed.

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opponent in these proceedings was in the entertainment business and for a number of years had been developing a television cartoon character around the name Spinney the little world and friends. By the relevant date discussions had taken place with various people but no trading activities had taken place.

Under Section 5(4)(a) - Passing Off the Hearing Officer considered the opponent’s claims against the criteria to launch a passing off action and considered that he must fail since, at the relevant date, he had no reputation or goodwill in his mark.

The ground under Section 3(1)(b) related to the distinctiveness of the mark at issue, and the Hearing Officer accepted that it was made up of ordinary dictionary words and that it had descriptive connotations. However, in the absence of evidence from the trade that such a term was required for use descriptively, the Hearing Officer concluded that the mark was not devoid of distinctive character or that it needed to be reserved for traders at large. Acceptance was also in line with the Registrar’s practice in examining "WORLD" marks.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1998/o06398.html