BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> HT (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o11899 (26 April 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o11899.html
Cite as: [1999] UKIntelP o11899

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


HT (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o11899 (26 April 1999)

For the whole decision click here: o11899

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/118/99
Decision date
26 April 1999
Hearing officer
Mr M Reynolds
Mark
HT
Classes
07, 09
Applicant
Hypertherm Incorporated
Opponent
AAF-cQuay Inc
Opposition
Sections 3(1)(b); 3(1)(c); 3(1)(d); 3(3)(b); 5(2)(b); 5(3) & 5(4)(a)

Result

Section3(1)(b) - Opposition successful

Section3(1)(b) - Opposition successful

Section 3(3) - Opposition failed

Section 3(3) - Opposition failed

Section5(2)(b) - Opposition failed

Section5(2)(b) - Opposition failed

Section5(3) - Opposition failed

Section5(3) - Opposition failed

Section 5(4) - Opposition failed

Section 5(4) - Opposition failed

Points Of Interest

Summary

Under Section 3 the Hearing Officer found that there was indeed a prima facie objection to the mark, and the evidence of use filed either at the application stage or in the proceedings had not overcome that objection. The opposition under Section 3(1)(b) succeeded accordingly. Under Sections 3(3), 5(3) and 5(4) the opponents had not made out their case. Under Section 5(2) the Hearing Officer considered either that the goods were not similar, or that a simple clarification of the specification could avoid any remote possibility of confusion.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o11899.html