BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> RALEIGH INTERNATIONAL DEVICE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o46099 (30 December 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o46099.html
Cite as: [1999] UKIntelP o46099

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


RALEIGH INTERNATIONAL DEVICE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [1999] UKIntelP o46099 (30 December 1999)

For the whole decision click here: o46099

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/460/99
Decision date
30 December 1999
Hearing officer
Mr G Salthouse
Mark
RALEIGH INTERNATIONAL & DEVICE
Classes
16, 21, 25
Applicants
Raleigh International Trust
Opponents
Derby Holdings Ltd
Opposition
Sections 3(6) Section 5(2) and 5(4)

Result

Section 3(6) - Withdrawn at Hearing

Section 5(2) - Partially successful in respect of Class 25

Section 5(4) - Partially successful in respect of Classes 25 and 26

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opponents had an extensive reputation in the mark RALEIGH (also registrations); in respect of bicycles and a registration in Class 9 in respect of protective clothing and helmets for cyclists. They also claimed user in respect of other goods such as drink bottles, sunglasses, pumps, bags and cycle shirts but such evidence as was filed was undated. A claim relating to licensing suffered from the same defect.

Under Section 5(2) the Hearing Officer considered that the respective marks were confusingly similar but in relation to the applicants application he considered that the only goods in conflict was with the applicants Class 25 goods and then only in respect of "clothing for cyclists".

Under Section 5(4) the Hearing Officer made a similar finding in respect of Classes 25 and also in respect of "badges relating to cycling in Class 26".

Application allowed to proceed as filed subject to restrictions of the Class 25 and Class 26 applications as follows:

Class 25: Articles of clothing excluding clothing for cyclists

Class 26: Badges; cloth badges; button badges; excluding badges related to cycling



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/1999/o46099.html