BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> GEORGE (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o11602 (14 March 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o11602.html Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o11602 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o11602
Result
Section 5(2)(b) - Opposition failed
Points Of Interest
Summary
The opponents opposition was based on their ownership of a number of registrations for the mark GIORGIO (and variations thereof) in a range of classes including Class 3 where the registrations cover identical goods to those of the applicant. The opponents filed details of user of their GIORGIO marks but this was insufficiently precise for the Hearing Officer to assume that their mark had an above average reputation at the relevant date.
Under Section 5(2)(b) it was common ground that identical goods were at issue and the Hearing Officer went on to compare the respective marks GEORGE and GIORGIO. While the respective marks differed visually by only three letters and both marks are the same name, the opponents mark being the Italian version of GEORGE, the Hearing Officer noted that the marks were different phonetically, that GEORGE would be recognised as a well known forename and that the goods at issue would be selected with some degree of care. In all the circumstances the Hearing Officer decided that the two marks were not confusingly similar.
