BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Leon Boole v Manhar Chauhan (Patent) [2002] UKIntelP o46102 (18 November 2002) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o46102.html Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o46102 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o46102
Summary
As a result of an uncontested reference and application under sections 37 and 13(3) respectively, it was found that Leon Boole should be mentioned as sole inventor and proprietor of the granted patent. The decision serves as a certificate to the effect that Manhar Chauhan ought not to have been mentioned as an inventor. It was directed that an erratum slip to this effect be prepared for the patent.
