BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> LE XV DU PRESIDENT (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o50702 (6 December 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o50702.html
Cite as: [2002] UKIntelP o50702

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


LE XV DU PRESIDENT (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2002] UKIntelP o50702 (6 December 2002)

For the whole decision click here: o50702

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/507/02
Decision date
6 December 2002
Hearing officer
Mr D Landau
Mark
LE XV DU PRESIDENT
Classes
33
Applicant
Direct Wines Limited
Opponent
BSA SA
Opposition
Section 5(3)

Result

Section 5(3) - Opposition failed.

Points Of Interest

Summary

Following consideration of it as a preliminary issue, additional evidence put forward by the opponents was admitted to the proceedings. The opponents' case was based on their registrations of 'PRESIDENT' in Classes 29 and 32. It was established that the goods at issue were not similar and Section 5(3) could therefore be invoked. The Hearing Officer therefore went on to consider the marks; which, in the result he found similar.

The matter therefore came down to use and reputation. The mark as used by the opponents was in a stylised lettering and with an acute accent over the letter E. However, after a detailed examination of the evidence the Hearing Officer concluded that the opponents had failed to establish a reputation within the meaning of Section 5(3).

In case he should be wrong in this, however, he went on to consider the matter of detriment, had a reputation been established. In this, he found no danger of tarnishing or fettering. Neither did he see any likelihood that the public would perceive a connection.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2002/o50702.html