BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> FORM (SHAPE) ONLY (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2003] UKIntelP o22603 (11 August 2003) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2003/o22603.html Cite as: [2003] UKIntelP o22603 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o22603
Result
Section 3(1)(b) - Opposition successful.
Section 3(1)(c) - No formal finding.
Section 3(1)(d) - No formal finding.
Section 3(6) - No formal finding.
Points Of Interest
Summary
This decision was in respect of consolidated oppositions to two applications; a second batch of consolidated oppositions for a further eleven applications, concerning the same parties and heard at the same time, is the subject of the decision set out in BL O/225/03, qv.
Under Section 3(1) the Hearing Officer noted that Section 3(1)(b) was likely to be determinative of the matter and he did not propose to deal with the objections under Section 3(1)(c) or Section 3(1)(d). After setting out the general principles to be followed in applying Section 3(1)(b) and listing the authorities from which they were derived, the Hearing Officer went on to review a number of decisions relating to washing/dishwasher tablet marks.
The elements of the marks in issue were their shapes, the colours employed in them and the manner in which those coloured elements were configured in the marks, he said, and whilst it would not be permissible to pick out one of those elements in turn, decide if it was not distinctive and thus dismiss the marks as a whole, he nevertheless decided to review each element, and give a final appraisal of the whole mark.
In the result, given the nature of the goods, the range of shapes and colours in which they are produced and the manner in which the colour features have been promoted to the public as indicators of function, he concluded that these particular three dimensional tablets would fail to serve as badges of origin. The objection under Section 3(1)(b) succeeded.
The Section 3(6) ground was peripheral to these cases, he decided, and he made no formal finding under that head.
