BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> J Maple Son Limited v Colin Stephen Pownall (Patent) [2004] UKIntelP o00104 (5 January 2004) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o00104.html Cite as: [2004] UKIntelP o00104, [2004] UKIntelP o104 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o00104
Summary
J Maple & Son Limited opposed Mr Pownall's application to amend the patent in suit on the grounds that the proposed amendments added subject matter and did not distinguish over the prior art which was the reason for the application, and that the application was made in bad faith. In a decision taken on the papers, the Hearing Officer allowed the amendments and awarded costs to the applicant.
