BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just Ā£1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> BI -AGRA (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2004] UKIntelP o04904 (24 February 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o04904.html
Cite as: [2004] UKIntelP o4904, [2004] UKIntelP o04904

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


BI-AGRA (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2004] UKIntelP o04904 (24 February 2004)

For the whole decision click here: o04904

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/049/04
Decision date
24 February 2004
Hearing officer
Mr M Reynolds
Mark
BI-AGRA
Classes
01
Applicant
Glenside Organics Limited
Opponent
Pfizer Inc
Opposition
Section 5(2)(b)

Result

Section 5(2)(b) - Opposition successful

Points Of Interest

Summary

The opposition was based on a UK registration of VIAGRA in Class 1 and a Community Trade Mark registration of the same mark for a much broader specification, also in Class 1. Referring to this broader specification the Hearing Officer found identical or closely similar goods to be at issue. He therefore proceeded to a comparison of the marks. The opponents’ marks had a high degree of distinctiveness he found. The marks had some overall visual similarity, but "not to a particularly high degree". Aurally, however, they were similar; the position on conceptual similarity was "broadly neutral".

Assessing the matter globally, and noting his own limited information on the relevant trade (agricultural fertilizers, chemicals etc), the Hearing Officer found a likelihood of confusion and the opposition succeeded accordingly.

After hearing the opposing submissions regarding costs, the Hearing Officer eventually awarded costs to the opponents in accordance with the published scale.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o04904.html