BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> ABB Switzerland Holding Ltd v QinetiQ Limited (Patent) [2004] UKIntelP o06704 (19 March 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o06704.html
Cite as: [2004] UKIntelP o06704, [2004] UKIntelP o6704

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


ABB Switzerland Holding Ltd v QinetiQ Limited [2004] UKIntelP o06704 (19 March 2004)

For the whole decision click here: o06704

Patent decision

BL number
O/067/04
Concerning rights in
GB 2123163
Hearing Officer
Mr S N Dennehey
Decision date
19 March 2004
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
ABB Switzerland Holding Ltd v QinetiQ Limited
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 section 72
Keywords
Added subject matter, Revocation
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The claims of the specification were amended before grant to include within their scope liquid crystal display constructions which did not include dye, in addition to constructions which did include dye. The specification referred to a specific embodiment which did not use dye, but the claimant argued that the broadening amendment to claim 1 included within its scope a variety of other arrangements which had not been described, and that the broadening amendment therefore extended the matter described beyond that disclosed in the original application. The hearing officer found that the broader wording did not extend the matter disclosed and no order for revocation was made.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o06704.html