BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> eSpeed Inc (Patent) [2004] UKIntelP o27604 (9 September 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o27604.html
Cite as: [2004] UKIntelP o27604

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


eSpeed Inc [2004] UKIntelP o27604 (9 September 2004)

For the whole decision click here: o27604

Patent decision

BL number
O/276/04
Concerning rights in
GB0217203.9
Hearing Officer
Mr S Probert
Decision date
9 September 2004
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
eSpeed Inc
Provisions discussed
PA1977 Section 1(2)(c); Rule 39 PCT
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

A method of limiting exposure to financial risk by imposing a monetary limit on the accumulated value of trades (e.g. bonds, futures etc.) that a trader can make in one day. Because a significant number of bids or offers may fail during the course of the day, the idea behind the invention is to take account of these failed bids/offers when deciding whether or not a trader has reached his/her credit limit. This is done by subtracting the value of failed trades from the total value of offers and bids accumulated by a trader during a day's trading. The final step of the invention involves shutting off the trader's ability to trade over the system when his/her credit limit has been exceeded.

The Hearing Officer concluded that the invention was a method of doing business as such.

Although the method uses a computer program, the Hearing Officer considered that the computer program was purely incidental, and he did not regard the invention as relating to a program for a computer as such.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2004/o27604.html