BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> BUFFALO CREEK (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2005] UKIntelP o16905 (17 June 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o16905.html Cite as: [2005] UKIntelP o16905 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o16905
Result
Appeal dismissed.
Points Of Interest
Summary
At first instance (see BL O/353/04) the Hearing Officer had found in favour of the applicant for invalidation. The registered proprietor appealed to the Appointed Person, contending that the Hearing Officer had erred in attaching geographical signification to both BUFFALO and BUFFALO CREEK, and had failed properly to consider the conceptual difference which resulted from the addition of the word CREEK to the word BUFFALO.
Following a detailed review of the Hearing Officer's decision, the Appointed Person upheld it and dismissed the appeal.