BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Intuwave Limited (Patent) [2006] UKIntelP o10206 (12 April 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o10206.html
Cite as: [2006] UKIntelP o10206

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Intuwave Limited [2006] UKIntelP o10206 (12 April 2006)

For the whole decision click here: o10206

Patent decision

BL number
O/102/06
Concerning rights in
GB 02385441
Hearing Officer
Mr S Probert
Decision date
12 April 2006
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Intuwave Limited
Provisions discussed
PA1977 Sections 1(2)(c) . Article 52 EPC
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention relates to an application programming environment in a "resource constrained" mobile telephone. It proposes the use of a runtime library comprising three types of code which enable a wide range of different applications to be constructed. These three types of code form what is described as a "restricted set of mandatory primitives" that are capable of being combined with additional code (called "glue logic") to create different applications. These primitives occupy very little code space, and this means that any primitives that are common to several applications can be burnt to ROM.

The Hearing Officer agreed that the test for patentability is as set out RiM v Inpro, ie. "Taking the claims correctly construed, what does the claimed invention contribute to the art outside excluded subject matter?" He concluded that the substance of the invention is a better way of writing a computer program, and that therefore the contribution to the art that is made by this invention is entirely within excluded subject matter - ie. programs for computers as such.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2006/o10206.html