BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> JUDGE SABATIER device STELLAR SABATIER device (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2007] UKIntelP o21507 (1 August 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o21507.html
Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o21507

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


JUDGE SABATIER device STELLAR SABATIER device (Trade Mark: Invalidity) [2007] UKIntelP o21507 (1 August 2007)

For the whole decision click here: o21507

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/215/07
Decision date
1 August 2007
Hearing officer
Mr M Foley
Mark
JUDGE SABATIER & device STELLAR SABATIER & device
Classes
08, 21
Registered Proprietors
Horwood Homewares Ltd
Applicants for a declaration of invalidity
Rousselon Freres et Cie
Application for invalidation
Section 47(2)(a) (citing Section 5(2)(b))

Result

Application for invalidation failed

Points Of Interest

Summary

The applications were brought based on three registrations of PROFESSIONAL SABATIER, LION SABATIER & SABATIER. The Hearing had first to deal with an application for a stay of proceedings pending the outcome of invalidation proceedings launched against the applicants’ earlier marks. In the result he refused a stay and proceeded to a consideration of the main matter.

The question of similarity in the marks centred around the presence of the word SABATIER in all of them. This word however (although distinctive in itself) was incorporated into a number of marks used by different traders. This was likely to focus attention on the other elements and overall there was no likelihood of confusion. The application for invalidation failed accordingly.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o21507.html