BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> United Parcel Services of America Inc. (Patent) [2007] UKIntelP o34007 (19 November 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o34007.html
Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o34007

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


United Parcel Services of America Inc. [2007] UKIntelP o34007 (19 November 2007)

For the whole decision click here: o34007

Patent decision

BL number
O/340/07
Concerning rights in
GB0518581.4
Hearing Officer
Mr A Bartlett
Decision date
19 November 2007
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
United Parcel Services of America Inc.
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 Section 1(2)(c)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention relates to a system for populating the fields of a web form by mapping data from a user’s contact list held in personal information manager (PIM) software to appropriate fields of the form. The applicant’s agent contended that the application was patentable because the invention provided a new result in the form of easier input of data which then formed the contribution. He also contended that the contribution of a newly introduced later claim was a new arrangement of hardware characterised by the way information was entered. The Hearing Officer applied the four step Aerotel/Macrossan test and concluded that in either case the hardware claimed was conventional. The contribution was therefore really what the system was programmed to do, and the Hearing Officer consequently decided that the contribution falls solely within the computer program exclusion.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o34007.html