BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Abbas Yamkangaz (Patent) [2008] UKIntelP o25508 (10 September 2008)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2008/o25508.html
Cite as: [2008] UKIntelP o25508

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Abbas Yamkangaz [2008] UKIntelP o25508 (10 September 2008)

For the whole decision click here: o25508

Patent decision

BL number
O/255/08
Concerning rights in
GB 0401039.3
Hearing Officer
Mr R C Kennell
Decision date
10 September 2008
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Abbas Yamkangaz
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 sections 1(1), 1(2)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused), Inventive step, Novelty
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention (which could be computer implemented) provided: (1) a text, (2) a programme or instructions on how to solve a problem based on, and possibly contained in, the text, (3) a formula, not necessarily mathematical, and which could in simple cases constitute the programme, containing variables to be used in solving the problem, (4) a list of possible values of variables for insertion into the formula, (5) choice of values from the list in order to solve the problem; and (6) display of the resulting solution. Refusing the application, the hearing officer held that, insofar as the invention was new and had an inventive step, it contributed (applying the Aerotel test) solely in the above excluded fields and was not technical in nature.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2008/o25508.html