BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Techniqs Ltd (Patent) [2011] UKIntelP o20311 (10 June 2011)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2011/o20311.html
Cite as: [2011] UKIntelP o20311

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Techniqs Ltd [2011] UKIntelP o20311 (10 June 2011)

For the whole decision click here: o20311

Patent decision

BL number
O/203/11
Concerning rights in
GB1015057.1
Hearing Officer
Miss J Pullen
Decision date
10 June 2011
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Techniqs Ltd
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 Section 14(3)
Keywords
Sufficiency
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention claims to be a charging unit for an electric vehicle consisting of a turbine attached to a driveshaft or axle of said vehicle to create electric current to power a battery and further comprising an internal air cooling system. An outer mechanism of the turbine remains static as it is attached to an outer shell/casing of the driveshaft or axle as a fixed component. An inner mechanism of the turbine is joined to an inner mechanism of the driveshaft or axle and rotates as part of the inner mechanism of the driveshaft or axle as the electric vehicle moves. The air cooling mechanism includes an outer casing surrounding the turbine, said casing having angled vents, and an inner casing also having angled vents. The application states that as the electric vehicle moves, air is forced through the outer casing and the inner casing, thus cooling the turbine.

The Hearing Officer upheld the examiner’s objection that the invention was not sufficiently disclosed to meet the requirements of section 14(3) of the Act and therefore refused the application.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2011/o20311.html