BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Nicholas David Smith (Patent) [2011] UKIntelP o40211 (23 November 2011) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2011/o40211.html Cite as: [2011] UKIntelP o40211 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o40211
Summary
The application relates to an exercise apparatus comprising a balance board arrangement that can be mounted on a separate ball and that a user can stand and balance upon. The board is defined in claim 1 as being substantially flat, although it is noted in the description that this term “substantially flat” could mean “slightly dished at the centre”. The examiner took the view that this gave a particular significance to the meaning of the term “significantly flat” beyond the normal purposive construction of the term, and, as a consequence, rendered the invention obvious in light of prior art patent literature. The Hearing Officer found that the general teaching of the description was to a board having a flat surface or a technically inconsequential departure from flatness. The inventive step argument fell away and the application was remitted to the examiner for grant.