BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> VMware Inc (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o17112 (25 April 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o17112.html
Cite as: [2012] UKIntelP o17112

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


VMware Inc (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o17112 (25 April 2012)

Patent decision

BL number
O/171/12
Concerning rights in
GB0821774.7
Hearing Officer
Mr H Jones
Decision date
25 April 2012
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
VMware Inc
Provisions discussed
Sections 1(1)(b)
Keywords
Inventive step
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The application is concerned with installing software on a computer system and resolving any dependencies that arise by making copies of dependant resources. The examiner’s inventive step objection was based on two sets of citations, the first set showing that it is known to copy shared resources and the second set showing that handling multiple dependencies in a run-time environment is well-known in the art. The hearing officer found that none of the citations disclosed or suggested copying shared resources when a dependency or conflict is detected, and concluded that the claims do involve an inventive step. The attorney offered to amend claim 12 in order to clarify the scope of the invention; once amended, the application could be granted.


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o17112


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o17112.html