BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Innovation Science Pty Limited (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o31512 (16 August 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o31512.html
Cite as: [2012] UKIntelP o31512

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Innovation Science Pty Limited (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o31512 (16 August 2012)

Patent decision

BL number
O/315/12
Concerning rights in
GB1001729.1
Hearing Officer
Mr B Buchanan
Decision date
16 August 2012
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Innovation Science Pty Limited
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 section 1(2)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention relates to a method and system for determining the possible location and timing of objects, including people and packages, in a transportation network. Objects joining and leaving the network are detected by sensors such as ticket barriers, number plate recognition and biometric or image recognition means. Using information relating to the network about nodes (e.g. stations or depots), paths (e.g. routes between nodes) and timings (e.g. scheduled timetable or actual transition times), the invention determines the potential whereabouts or journey characteristics of objects within the network within a time frame.

The Hearing Officer considered the four-step test in Aerotel/Macrossan in the light of the Symbian judgment, and found the contribution to relate to a mathematical method, a method for doing business and a program for a computer as such, and having found no technical contribution refused the application under Section 18(3).


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o31512


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o31512.html