BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Mr Guy Jackson-Ebben and Wine Innovations Ltd and Mr James Nash (Patent) [2014] UKIntelP o46514 (30 October 2014)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2014/o46514.html
Cite as: [2014] UKIntelP o46514

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Mr Guy Jackson-Ebben and Wine Innovations Ltd and Mr James Nash (Patent) [2014] UKIntelP o46514 (30 October 2014)

Patent decision

BL number
O/465/14
Concerning rights in
GB 2469554
Hearing Officer
Mr J Elbro
Decision date
30 October 2014
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Mr Guy Jackson-Ebben and Wine Innovations Ltd and Mr James Nash
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 Sections 8, 12, and 37
Keywords
Entitlement
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The claimant sought entitlement to a patent relating to a particular method of evacuating the headspace of a pre-filled wine goblet by means of a nitrogen injection. The claimant had previously had an association with the defendants and worked on improving the operation of a previous machine, during which time he claimed to have invented the invention in the patent.

The hearing officer found that the invention was already embodied in the previous version of the machine, and hence that the invention had been already made by the time of the claimant’s involvement.

The claimant also raised a number of other issues about whether the patent was invalid for prior disclosure, or the defendants were not entitled to it, but the hearing officer found there was insufficient evidence to justify any such conclusions.


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o46514


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2014/o46514.html