BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Innoplexus AG (Patent) [2021] UKIntelP o60321 (17 August 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2021/o60321.html
Cite as: [2021] UKIntelP o60321

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Patent decision

BL number
O/603/21
Concerning rights in
GB1722307.4
Hearing Officer
Mr B Buchanan
Decision date
17 August 2021
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Innoplexus AG
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977 section 1(2)(c)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The claimed invention relates to a method, system, and program for identifying an increasingly popular (nascent) topic related to a field of interest and addresses the problem of analysing aggregated data across multiple channels. The topic may be provided by a user as a search query, and the claimed invention can analyse data from multiple channels such as forums and blogs on the internet as well as other sources. By using the invention, a user can reliably and accurately discover sustained increasing references to e.g. a specific medical treatment and use the information to assist investment, research and innovation.

The Hearing Officer followed the four stepAerotel/Macrossantest to determine whether there was a technical contribution and considered theAT&T(HTC/Apple)signposts.The identified contribution was not found to provide the required technical effect and the claimed invention was found to relate solely to a program for a computer as such, so the application did not meet the requirements of section 1(2)(c). The application was refused under section 18(3).

Full decisionO/603/21 PDF document 299Kb


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2021/o60321.html