BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Global Design Corporation Ltd. (Patent) [2023] UKIntelP o021423 (7 March 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2023/o021423.html
Cite as: [2023] UKIntelP o021423, [2023] UKIntelP o21423

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Patent decision

BL number
O/0214/23
Concerning rights in
GB1808015.0
Hearing Officer
Mr B Buchanan
Decision date
28 February 2023
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Global Design Corporation Ltd.
Provisions discussed
Patents Act 1977, section 1(2)(a),(c)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The application relates to a means for providing a better estimate of energy consumption (and the associated charges) of an energy user. The claimed invention obtains the amount and cost of a user-s past energy consumption during a previous billing period. The system then estimates a -consumption profile- for a user and obtains tariff information from a range of energy providers. The system compares estimated equivalent costs for different tariffs with the actual cost of the energy used. The system thereby identifies the -best fit- tariff that is likely to be the tariff the user is subscribed to. Once this has been identified, the system can present to a user the likely cost of their next bill based on smart meter readings. The Hearing Officer applied the four step Aerotel/Macrossan test and considered the AT&T signposts. The alleged contribution reflected the steps carried out to process large amounts of data using mathematical steps. It was found not to provide the required technical effect and the claimed invention was found to relate solely to a method for doing business and a program for a computer as such, so the application did not meet the requirements of section 1(2)(c). The application was refused under section 18(3).

Full decisionO/0214/23 PDF document 410Kb


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2023/o021423.html