BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> LO v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) (European Union law - free movement) [2017] UKUT 440 (AAC) (9 November 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2017/440.html Cite as: [2017] WLR(D) 790, [2017] UKUT 440 (AAC), [2018] PTSR 663 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Buy ICLR report: [2018] PTSR 663] [View ICLR summary: [2017] WLR(D) 790] [Help]
LO v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) (European Union law - free movement) [2017] UKUT 440 (AAC) (9 November 2017)
An EU national, separated from her unmarried partner, a UK national, who is the mother of two very young UK national children, is precluded by order of the Family Court from taking the children out of the UK and thus from returning to her state of nationality, where she could access whatever social assistance is available to its nationals. Can she, in the light of the law as understood post Mirga, sucessfully assert a proportionality claim to establish a right to reside? Do the children have rights under Arts 20 and 21 TFEU, which are being infringed? If so, might their mother have a derivative right via the -effective citizenship- principle discussed in Sanneh?
A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 440.pdf
