MC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) [2019] UKUT 264 (AAC) (27 August 2019)

BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> MC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) [2019] UKUT 264 (AAC) (27 August 2019)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2019/264.html
Cite as: [2019] UKUT 264 (AAC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Judicial Summary

When considering the ability to follow the route of a journey, is it permissible to limit consideration to only a short journey?

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2019] UKUT 264 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2019/264.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> MC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) [2019] UKUT 264 (AAC) (27 August 2019) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2019/264.html Cite as: [2019] UKUT 264 (AAC)