BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Crossland v The Information Commissioner and & Anor (Information rights - Information rights: practice and procedure) [2020] UKUT 263 (AAC) (2 September 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/263.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 263 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Crossland v (1) The Information Commissioner and (2) Leeds City Council [2020] UKUT 263 (AAC) (2 September 2020)


Information Rights - application to Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal from First-tier Tribunal interim case management directions - whether the General Regulatory Chamber exercised a discretion unreasonably in requiring the appellant to state why his appeal should not be struck under rule 8(4) of the GRC Procedure Rules - importance of overriding objective - observations on the Upper Tribunal’s power to strike out.

Case management decision taken as a matter of the tribunal's discretion. The Upper Tribunal will not interfere unless the decision was unreasonable or the GRC misdirected itself in law.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 263 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/263.html