TS (by TS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA); EK (by MK) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA) (Equality Act, Human rights law) [2020] UKUT 284 (AAC) (12 October 2020)

BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> TS (by TS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA); EK (by MK) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA) (Equality Act, Human rights law) [2020] UKUT 284 (AAC) (12 October 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/284.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 284 (AAC), [2021] AACR 4

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

TS (by TS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA); EK (by MK) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA) [2020] UKUT 284 (AAC) (12 October 2020)

1. The Upper Tribunal does not have jurisdiction on a statutory appeal to consider breaches of the Public Sector Equality Duty ("PSED"). Obiter dicta in AK v SSWP [2017] UKUT 420 (AAC) followed. Decision of the High Court in Hamnett v Essex CC [2014] EWHC 246 (Admin) not followed. 2. If, contrary to 1, the Upper Tribunal does have jurisdiction in respect of the PSED, SSWP was in breach of it in relation to children aged 3-16 in extending the Past Presence Test (PPT) from 26 weeks to 104 weeks. 3. The extension of the PPT is in breach of Art 14 with A1P1 in relation to the appellant British national children returning to Great Britain from a period of residence abroad. FM v SSWP [2017] UKUT 380 not followed. 4. Where the challenge is directed to the human rights implications of making existing legislation more onerous, the appropriate remedy is to disapply the amending legislation: RR v SSWP [2019] UKSC 52 applied. 5. The existing line of authority derived from CSDLA/852/2002 regarding advance claims for Disability Living Allowance followed.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 284 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/284.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> TS (by TS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA); EK (by MK) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (DLA) (Equality Act, Human rights law) [2020] UKUT 284 (AAC) (12 October 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/284.html Cite as: [2020] UKUT 284 (AAC), [2021] AACR 4