BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Lownie v The Information Commissioner, The Foreign and Commonwealth Office and The National Archives (GIA) (Information rights) [2020] UKUT 32 (AAC) (28 January 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/32.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 32 (AAC), [2020] WLR 3319, [2020] WLR(D) 362, [2020] 1 WLR 3319

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [View ICLR summary: [2020] WLR(D) 362] [Buy ICLR report: [2020] 1 WLR 3319] [Help]


Lownie v The Information Commissioner, The Foreign and Commonwealth Office and The National Archives (GIA) (Information rights) [2020] UKUT 32 (AAC) (28 January 2020)


(1) Approach by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) to a change in position by a public authority after expiry of the time limit for responding to the appeal, so as to extend the scope of information to which it is claimed an exemption applied - application of Birkett v DEFRA [2012] AACR 32 - whether principles in Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2014] 1 WLR 795 applied - consideration of BPP Holdings Ltd v HMRC [2017] 1 WLR 2945.

(2) Meaning of "relates to" in section 23(1) Freedom of Information Act 2000 - consideration of APPGER v IC and FCO [2016] AACR 5 and Corderoy and Ahmed v IC and others [2018] AACR 19 - whether scope of section 23 to be defined by reference to section 24 - application of section 23 to anodyne information.

(3) Whether the FTT treated the engagement of section 23 as having inherent weight for the purpose of the public interest balancing exercise in relation to information contained in a historical record - relevance of policy reasons underlying section 23 - whether FTT's decision was irrational.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 32 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/32.html