BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> SM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) (Personal independence payment - general) [2021] UKUT 140 (AAC) (6 June 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/140.html
Cite as: [2021] UKUT 140 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]



SM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP) [2021] UKUT 140 (AAC) (6 June 2021)


Observations about the need (or otherwise) to put apparent contradictions in the evidence to appellants and about the extent to which it is necessary to refer to the criteria at Reg 4(2A) of the PIP Regs 2013 in a statement of reasons.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2021] UKUT 140 (AAC)


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/140.html