BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> TC and BW v London Borough of Islington (Special educational needs) [2021] UKUT 196 (9 August 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/196.html
Cite as: [2021] UKUT 196

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


TC and BW v London Borough of Islington [2021] UKUT 196 (9 August 2021)


When conducting a remote hearing where one of the parties and their witness/quasi-representative were hearing impaired, the First-tier Tribunal had done enough for its hearing to be a fair one. The individuals concerned had indicated strategies by which they could manage and not subsequently indicated that, after all, they could not do so and there was nothing to put the First-tier Tribunal on notice that that might be the case. Dicta of Longstaff J in Rackham v NHS Professionals Ltd UKEAT/0010/15/LA, [2015] UKEAT 0110_15_1612 regarding the importance to personal autonomy of respecting the choices of people with disabilities applied. On the evidence the key points on which the appellant was dissatisfied had not gone wrong for her because of her hearing impairment but as the result of choices made during the proceedings.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2021] UKUT 196

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/196.html