BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Carrick Construction Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18738 (25 August 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18738.html
Cite as: [2004] UKVAT V18738

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Carrick Construction Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18738 (25 August 2004)

    18738

    Default Surcharge: late receipt of return; time of posting not established; appeal refused.

    EDINBURGH TRIBUNAL CENTRE

    CARRICK CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Appellants

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents

    Tribunal: (Chairman): T Gordon Coutts, QC

    Sitting in Edinburgh on Wednesday 25 August 2004

    for the Appellants HEARD ON PAPERS ONLY

    for the Respondents Mr A McCue

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2004.

     
    DECISION
    This appeal was heard at the request of the Appellant on papers only. The only evidence from the Appellant to counter the evidence on paper from the Respondent that the return due on 31/01/04 was not received until 09/02/04 was a letter asserting that the cheque was sent on 30 January 2004. The clear evidence from the Respondents' officer and her account of the system at Southend was that the date of receipt was 9 February 2004. On an overall view a delay in the post could not account for a whole weeks default. The Appellant has a very bad record of late returns and payments. The surcharge on this occasion had achieved the 15% level.
    Clear and acceptable evidence from the Appellant as to the circumstances of his posting the return sufficient to negative the inference arising from the habitual lateness of his returns was not available.
    The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
    T GORDON COUTTS, QC
    CHAIRMAN
    RELEASE: 25 AUGUST 2004

    EDN/004/28


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18738.html