BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Better Drives Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18772 (30 September 2004) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18772.html Cite as: [2004] UKVAT V18772 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
18772
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/2004/0282
BETTER DRIVES LTD Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal: Mr M S Johnson (Chairman)
Mr R Presho FCMA
Sitting in public in York on the 15 September 2004
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to the imposition of a default surcharge and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 (as amended) coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Mr N Sullivan, Managing Director of the Appellant, for the Appellant and Mr D Abberton, counsel instructed by the Solicitor for the Customs and Excise, for the Respondents
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that a reasonable excuse exists for the VAT return for the Appellant's accounting period ended 31 December 2003 and the value added tax due in respect of the period covered by the return not having been despatched at such a time and in such a manner that it was reasonable to expect that they would be received by the Respondents within the appropriate time limit
And this tribunal accordingly directs that this appeal is allowed.
MR M S JOHNSON
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 30 September 2004