BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> AK Waste Management Ltd v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V19036 (12 April 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19036.html Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19036 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
Rule 26(2)
19036
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/04/0876
AK WASTE MANAGEMENT LIMITED Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: Colin Bishopp
Marjorie Kostick BA FCA CTA
Sitting in public in Birmingham on the 6 April 2005
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to surcharge assessments dated 16 January 2004, 16 April 2004 and 16 July 2004 in the sums of £4679, £5313 and £5882 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Mr R Mansell of the Solicitor's office of HM Customs and Excise for the Respondents and no one appearing for the Appellant
And this tribunal having heard this appeal under rule 26(2) of the said Rules and having announced its decision
And the Respondents by their said representative stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the defaults which resulted in the Respondents making the assessments under appeal since the lack of funds occasioned by the Appellant's trading group policies cannot amount to such an excuse
And this tribunal directs that this appeal is dismissed and that there is to be no direction as to costs
COLIN BISHOPP
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 12 April 2005
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005